The Choice Of Law Agreement

54 In addition to the following cases, see also Sawyer/Atari Interactive Inc [2005] EWHC 2351, [2006] ILPr 129 (Ch) [59], [62], Stonebridge Underwriting Ltd v Ontario Municipal Insurance Exchange [2010] EWHC 2279 (Comm Ct) [33], [36], see [44]; Caresse Navigation Ltd v National Electricity Office (The Channel Ranger) [2013] EWHC 3081 (Com Ct) [57]-[65]; cf Golden Ocean Group Ltd/Salgaocar Mining Industries Pvt Ltd (n 25) [143]; Frame SA v Astra Asigurari SA [2005] EWHC 2626, [2006] 1 Lloyd`s Rep 560 (Com Ct). For cases where the parties have made a combined choice of law and jurisdiction, see: Shell International Petroleum Co Ltd/Coral Oil Co Ltd [1999] 1 Lloyd`s Rep 72 (Com Ct); Akai Pty Ltd v People`s Insurance Co Ltd [1998] 1 Lloyd`s Rep 90 (Com Ct); Horn Linie GmbH/Panamericana Formas e Impresos SA [2006] EWHC 373, [2006] 2 Lloyd`s Rep 44 (Com Ct). Delaware courts have traditionally had a more liberal view of the standard law choice clause than many other courts, as they generally felt that a standard varietal clause would be sufficient to include claims based on unlawful facts that were not limited to contractual claims alone. The Delaware court argument is supported by Strine`s participation, then Vice-Chancellor, abry Partners V, LP v. F-W Acquisition LLC, 891 A.2d 1032, 1048 (Del Ch. 2006) illustrates that a standard variety selection clause similar to the one mentioned above was deemed sufficient to cover both the unauthorized and contractual rights arising from a disputed acquisition contract. According to Strine, then Vice-Chancellor: 44 cf Banco Atlantico/British Bank of Middle East (n 15) 510, where the High Court had found that the link between the dispute with England was “fragile”, but that the Court of Appeal refused to grant a stay because the foreign court would not make the Spanish electoral convention effective (to the extent that it described the relationship between the defendants and England as “solid”. 69 New Hampshire Insurance Co/ Strabag Bau AG [1992] 1 Lloyd`s Rep 361 (CA) 371-372. Article 23 of the Brussels Regulation I (N 4) stipulates that civil registration agreements must be concluded either in writing or in writing” or in a form “consistent with the practices found between the parties” or by international commercial practices.

67 Ace Insurance Ltd/Moose Enterprise Pty Ltd (n 62) [47]-[53]: The Court correctly justified that the law-choice agreements are primarily declaratory, but then proposed that the declaratory agreements be in a class other than alliances or promises: [51]-[52]. 60 ibid. [36] – [38]. But see Howden North America Inc/ ACE European Group Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1624, [2013] Lloyd`s Rep IR 512, which concludes that it is not appropriate to provide a statement that English law is applicable in cases where foreign proceedings are in progress and where the foreign court may ignore an explicit or tacit choice of English law in order to guarantee a possible defence for the enforcement of the foreign judgment. Since commercial transactions and contractual obligations may exceed jurisdictional limits within a country as well as international borders, legal issues may arise when contractual terms or contractual disputes are necessary. Since laws differ from one legal order to another, it is possible that contractual terms may be interpreted differently between legal systems or that parts of a contract that can be implemented in one jurisdiction would be unenforceable under the laws of another.

Posted in Uncategorized   

Author: swillans